Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
blogs I like
- The Traveling Pineapple
- MadHaiku
- The Malitz Muse
- stop & wander
- East Side Gardeners
- Eternally Huckdoll
- Second Ring of Nervana
- foundclothing
- Throes like a grrrl
- Margaret and Helen
- the running mule
- Thorley, LLP
- snide and prejudiced
- bannedbookscafe
- Postcards From Yo Momma
- Princess Sparkle Pony's Photo Blog
- The Needs of the Few
- Stick Figures, True Stories
- In The Pink
- Morning Martini
- drool & drivel
- bullshattuck
- wonkette
- 13thfloor
old things
-
▼
2007
(175)
-
▼
April
(22)
- Is your poodle really a sheep?
- Funny (or maybe sexy) picture of the day
- Here's the good news, you have until August 16th t...
- Is it really OK for you to vote?
- Texas wants to save your marriage
- Here is a story that makes me wonder...
- I can't help it, but Idol keeps giving back
- Who needs to worry about terrorists when we have p...
- The first step is admitting your problem
- Today's lesson
- Alberto!
- Let's get some shoes!
- This is why I almost never see famous people
- Bring out the welcome wagon
- Not that I really pray, but my non-prayers have be...
- Alanis Morissette sings "My Humps"
- When fact and fiction collide
- If you don't want to go to school today, please ju...
- A not so honest mistake
- A small victory for those of us that like oxygen
- Happy April Fool's Day
- I have a question
-
▼
April
(22)
2 comments:
Uh, I'm, with Opie on this one. And listening for TERRORISTS is a lot different than attorney client privledge.
Wiretapping without a warrant is obtaining evidence without due process of law. And if you think wiretapping a lot of innocent people without a warrant in hopes of finding a terrorist is alright, I don't want you in charge of anything.
Post a Comment